Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on May 09, 2002 05:07 AM
Sure. Just define "better", please. It can be "better" because it performs faster, or is more stable, or requires less resources or is easier to control. But it can also be "better" because it satisfies a different (and more satisfactory to some) social, ethical or political idea.
Re:The Peruvian bill, OT
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on May 09, 2002 05:07 AMJust define "better", please.
It can be "better" because it performs faster, or is more stable, or requires less resources or is easier to control.
But it can also be "better" because it satisfies a different (and more satisfactory to some) social, ethical or political idea.
#