Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on June 16, 2002 12:57 AM
You're making crap up. PostgreSQL is stable; I've used it in relatively high volume production environments without trouble. I've never experienced server crashes or table corruption.
MySQL still doesn't do transactions in a stable version, still lacks subselects (these are actually very useful/performance enhancihg), and still doesn't support stored procedures/server site procedural language functions. Sorry, MySQL isn't near the quality of PostgreSQL; your assertions to the contrary are ill-informed and the aspersions you attempt to cast are thin and transparent. Back under the bridge, little troll.
bullschiz
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on June 16, 2002 12:57 AMMySQL still doesn't do transactions in a stable version, still lacks subselects (these are actually very useful/performance enhancihg), and still doesn't support stored procedures/server site procedural language functions. Sorry, MySQL isn't near the quality of PostgreSQL; your assertions to the contrary are ill-informed and the aspersions you attempt to cast are thin and transparent. Back under the bridge, little troll.
#