Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on July 17, 2002 07:58 PM
Sorry, but no.
You're only required to release the source if you redistribute the modifications. In-house modification doesn't imply you have to release your changes. So they don't have to release the changes. Would it be good if they did so? I think so, as they'd get the benefit of public review... but they don't have to do so.
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:Is not it Linux after all?
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 17, 2002 07:58 PMYou're only required to release the source if you redistribute the modifications. In-house modification doesn't imply you have to release your changes. So they don't have to release the changes. Would it be good if they did so? I think so, as they'd get the benefit of public review... but they don't have to do so.
My € 0.002
#