WHich is it: Huked on fonix, or huked on BONG-ix werked for SCO?
Nahh, in their minds, they got it right. But to us, obviously they mixed up "GNU" with "canoe" "Kazoo"... So, either they're up Shit Creek, Ogreville... or they're whistlying from the Kazoo.. stuck in their butts... (and, I thing somebody told them: "PUT one thumb in your *ss, and the other in your mouth. Stand by for me to say: "SWITCH!" ") Well, when hear "eee-eee-ee-eee-" and they don't look like ducks, it's probably the Sore, Cored Orses squeaking up to the US District Court in SF...."
Maybe if IBM and the rest of the non-sco/non-ms world whacks SCO in the mouth they'll fart out those Kazoos, slink back into their canoes, and paddle or dawdle back home to clean up their Singularly Corrupted Overbyte code...heheh heheh
This is NOT the kind of fragmentation we need. I hope SuSE has learned not to play ball with companies on the languishing end of tech but which happen to own a few key pieces of technology which can be Secretively, Cunningly, Obscenely hammered over the heads of the industry.
Now, no matter WHAT the economy does, these dipshits in sco have practically poured grease and razors on the race track BEHIND ms and AHEAD of Linux. Selfish, ARROGANT, AHOLES.
THIS is the kind of crap that for YEARS has had me believing that ALL large corporations MUST have lifespans.
Now, let's make a web page that ties together all the properties owned by ms, sco, and a few other bad seeds. Then, when IT departments have discretionary purchasing authority, they can politically and expediently "overlook" products from such companies. The fastest way for the country and its CEOs to be FORCED to shape their asses up is to stop PURCHASING THEIR PRODUCTS if they are being malicious and destructive to the masses or the little guy trying to make an honest living.
SCO is sullying the otherwise fine people of Santa Cruz. So is effectively Santa SCREWS, or Santa SCROOGE
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:GNU=Gnus Not Unix. as in _NOT_ Unix.
Posted by: David Syes on May 16, 2003 08:41 AMWHich is it: Huked on fonix, or huked on BONG-ix werked for SCO?
Nahh, in their minds, they got it right. But to us, obviously they mixed up "GNU" with "canoe" "Kazoo"... So, either they're up Shit Creek, Ogreville... or they're whistlying from the Kazoo.. stuck in their butts... (and, I thing somebody told them: "PUT one thumb in your *ss, and the other in your mouth. Stand by for me to say: "SWITCH!" ") Well, when hear "eee-eee-ee-eee-" and they don't look like ducks, it's probably the Sore, Cored Orses squeaking up to the US District Court in SF...."
Maybe if IBM and the rest of the non-sco/non-ms world whacks SCO in the mouth they'll fart out those Kazoos, slink back into their canoes, and paddle or dawdle back home to clean up their Singularly Corrupted Overbyte code...heheh heheh
This is NOT the kind of fragmentation we need. I hope SuSE has learned not to play ball with companies on the languishing end of tech but which happen to own a few key pieces of technology which can be Secretively, Cunningly, Obscenely hammered over the heads of the industry.
Now, no matter WHAT the economy does, these dipshits in sco have practically poured grease and razors on the race track BEHIND ms and AHEAD of Linux. Selfish, ARROGANT, AHOLES.
THIS is the kind of crap that for YEARS has had me believing that ALL large corporations MUST have lifespans.
Now, let's make a web page that ties together all the properties owned by ms, sco, and a few other bad seeds. Then, when IT departments have discretionary purchasing authority, they can politically and expediently "overlook" products from such companies. The fastest way for the country and its CEOs to be FORCED to shape their asses up is to stop PURCHASING THEIR PRODUCTS if they are being malicious and destructive to the masses or the little guy trying to make an honest living.
SCO is sullying the otherwise fine people of Santa Cruz. So is effectively Santa SCREWS, or Santa SCROOGE
#