Posted by: David Mohring
on June 02, 2003 11:26 AM
Anonymous wrote "If SCO's claim has merrit, it will just mean that the Linux kernel will not be distributable until the problem code is excised".
Read the article again.
If SCO itself has sold or distributed GPL'ed content then SCO must, by the terms of the GPL license, provide an implicit license and grant the right to use the source code under the terms of the GPL.
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:What is Novell's 95% point of view?
Posted by: David Mohring on June 02, 2003 11:26 AMRead the article again.
If SCO itself has sold or distributed GPL'ed content then SCO must, by the terms of the GPL license, provide an implicit license and grant the right to use the source code under the terms of the GPL.
#