Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on June 24, 2003 12:35 AM
This attitude really annoys me. Instead of laying the blame for broken software at the door of the criminally negligent idiots who made it, we instead blame the user of the software. What kind of reasoning, if any, is in use here?
I can just see myself explaining this to an elderly relative:
Me: People can attach files to emails and send them to you. You click on the attachment to open it.
Elderly relative: Oh, thats easy.
Me: Oh, by the way, some attachments, which look just like every other attachment, contain viruses and/or worms, and if you open one of those, you will be infected. Everyone will then call you an idiot.
Elderly relative: Oh dear! How do I know which attachment is ok?
Me: Well, you can't really.
Eldery relative: Um, maybe I'll stick with writing letters.
The moral: There is no reason for email viruses to exist. They only exist because of the idiocy of Microsoft. They should not even be called "email viruses", they should be called "Outlook viruses."
Re:Blaming Outlook
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on June 24, 2003 12:35 AMthe blame for broken software at the door of the
criminally negligent idiots who made it, we
instead blame the user of the software. What kind
of reasoning, if any, is in use here?
I can just see myself explaining this to an elderly relative:
Me: People can attach files to emails and send
them to you. You click on the attachment to open
it.
Elderly relative: Oh, thats easy.
Me: Oh, by the way, some attachments, which
look just like every other attachment, contain
viruses and/or worms, and if you open one of
those, you will be infected. Everyone will
then call you an idiot.
Elderly relative: Oh dear! How do I know which
attachment is ok?
Me: Well, you can't really.
Eldery relative: Um, maybe I'll stick with writing
letters.
The moral: There is no reason for email viruses
to exist. They only exist because of the
idiocy of Microsoft. They should not even be
called "email viruses", they should be called
"Outlook viruses."
#