Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on August 20, 2003 02:25 AM
It reveals that the code SCO showed at the conference yesterday as proof of its claims came from a 1980's version of Unix which has been licensed under a BSD-style open source license.
But since the terms of that license have clearly been violated, The SCO Group really does have a case. Read the license and look at <A HREF="http://www.funet.fi/pub/Linux/PEOPLE/Linus/v2.4/patch-html/patch-2.4.19/linux-2.4.19_arch_ia64_sn_io_ate_utils.c.html" TITLE="funet.fi">the patch</a funet.fi> that contains plagerized code and you will see that the terms of the license were ignored and violated.
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:Ha!
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on August 20, 2003 02:25 AMBut since the terms of that license have clearly been violated, The SCO Group really does have a case. Read the license and look at <A HREF="http://www.funet.fi/pub/Linux/PEOPLE/Linus/v2.4/patch-html/patch-2.4.19/linux-2.4.19_arch_ia64_sn_io_ate_utils.c.html" TITLE="funet.fi">the patch</a funet.fi> that contains plagerized code and you will see that the terms of the license were ignored and violated.
#