<A HREF="http://www.pclinuxonline.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=Forums&file=viewtopic&topic=870&forum=37" TITLE="pclinuxonline.com">PCLinuxOnline</a pclinuxonline.com> forum anonymous poster claims to be employed by non-SCO company in Canopy building suggests lots of things going on behind the scenes. (Keep up the emails to Canopy companies, folks!)
My guess: Not a DOS attack. Either SCO has some legal reason where they need to alter what's there (like they did in Germany when they took their site down breifly to comply with a court order), or (dare I hope) there has been a DOJ raid. Maybe Canopy has realized the folly of the SCO plan, and is trying to minimize the damage to themselves and other companies under them.
It will be interesting to see what's there when it comes back.
Likely not DOS attack. Relevent links
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2003 01:04 AM<A HREF="http://www.pclinuxonline.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=Forums&file=viewtopic&topic=870&forum=37" TITLE="pclinuxonline.com">PCLinuxOnline</a pclinuxonline.com> forum anonymous poster claims to be employed by non-SCO company in Canopy building suggests lots of things going on behind the scenes. (Keep up the emails to Canopy companies, folks!)
My guess: Not a DOS attack. Either SCO has some legal reason where they need to alter what's there (like they did in Germany when they took their site down breifly to comply with a court order), or (dare I hope) there has been a DOJ raid. Maybe Canopy has realized the folly of the SCO plan, and is trying to minimize the damage to themselves and other companies under them.
It will be interesting to see what's there when it comes back.
#