Linux.com

Re:paranoia

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 05, 2003 12:49 AM
Did you even bother to read the article before posting?

Note this part:

> The Slammer worm penetrated the plant's internal network and lodged in an unpatched Windows server. The worm's scanning slowed the internal network to a crawl, eventually crashing the plant's Safety Parameter Display System...

Maybe the plant managed to stay up, but the danger was there.

For you to claim that it's not a problem, is like me saying, "My brakes may have failed, but I managed to steer away from everything until the car came to a halt, so it's not a problem."

Windows should not be used for enterprise level applications. It's not safe.

And neither Windows nor Linux should be used for things like running a nuclear reactor. For that you need a fault-tolerant, mathematically-verified micro-kernel.

One candidate for critical operations is QNX. In the future, however, in line with the article's thesis, an Open Source micro-kernel might be even better. Maybe that's where GNU Hurd will initially find its niche.

#

Return to Can open-source software prevent the next big blackout?