Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on September 12, 2003 06:51 AM
But the code is already public. Anybody can review it, trace its origin, and most importantly understand what it does. SCO cannot ague honnestly the point that not revealing where the alleged infringing code is located protects the said code. A gifted hacker can understand code as he reads it just like a gifted musician can "hear" music as he reads it. The code is public. Therefore, SCO's argument is completely disingenuous. It can only be made by a bunch of overpaid, arrogant, and unethical suits like McBride et al.
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:Another Proof -- SCO's False Claim(s)
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 12, 2003 06:51 AMSCO cannot ague honnestly the point that not revealing where the alleged infringing code is located protects the said code.
A gifted hacker can understand code as he reads it just like a gifted musician can "hear" music as he reads it.
The code is public. Therefore, SCO's argument is completely disingenuous. It can only be made by a bunch of overpaid, arrogant, and unethical suits like McBride et al.
#