Linux.com

"interpreted" languages

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on October 29, 2003 06:45 AM
Your decision to exclude a whole raft of potentially viable solutions based on something as arbitrary as whether it is "interpreted" or "compiled" completely baffles me. Using performance as the reason is a red herring. I have no problem with your decision to exclude programs that do not perform well, but I think you might be surprised at how capable a properly written "interpreted" program can handle something like this. Maybe you should at least try some before issuing a blanket judgement.

#

Return to Bayesian spam filtering for the masses