Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on October 29, 2003 09:21 AM
It's not a matter of belief, it's just a matter of (tested) performance.
While evaluating potential candidates, I simply found that Annoyance Filter (and to a lesser extent, CRM114) performed much better than other tools, some of which by coincidence based on Perl and Python.
Whether it's due to the language or to the programmer, frankly I don't care.
I didn't mean to start a holy war, it was as simple as selecting the right tool for the job.
Re:"interpreted" languages
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on October 29, 2003 09:21 AMWhile evaluating potential candidates, I simply found that Annoyance Filter (and to a lesser extent, CRM114) performed much better than other tools, some of which by coincidence based on Perl and Python.
Whether it's due to the language or to the programmer, frankly I don't care.
I didn't mean to start a holy war, it was as simple as selecting the right tool for the job.
Corrado
#