Posted by: Peter Robertson
on December 02, 2003 09:13 PM
In your opinion.
Which I happen to disagree with since there isn't exactly a vast amount of difference between Red Hat 9 and Fedora Core 1, there are updated packages, graphical boot, an update to a better GNOME and other version updates.
I really can't see how Fedora can be significantly worse when its a full release, (the lack of a box really doesn't bother me, I do have a pen and CD cases), the beta version is provided and released at a different location on the FTP server and most of the developers are the same people.
In fact I see what you're saying as an insult to the developers, you're impying that they have become rotten at QA overnight (presumably the night Red Hat made their announcement?)
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:I discovered.
Posted by: Peter Robertson on December 02, 2003 09:13 PMWhich I happen to disagree with since there isn't exactly a vast amount of difference between Red Hat 9 and Fedora Core 1, there are updated packages, graphical boot, an update to a better GNOME and other version updates.
I really can't see how Fedora can be significantly worse when its a full release, (the lack of a box really doesn't bother me, I do have a pen and CD cases), the beta version is provided and released at a different location on the FTP server and most of the developers are the same people.
In fact I see what you're saying as an insult to the developers, you're impying that they have become rotten at QA overnight (presumably the night Red Hat made their announcement?)
#