He's a left-liberal. He subscribes to the "living Constitution" school of thought which means that the Constitution means whatever you want it to mean regardless of what it actually says.
In the real world, "Congress shall make no law" on a certain issue means that Congress shall make no law on that issue. In the left-liberal world of Republicans and Democrats, it means whatever the "living Constitution" has changed to mean over time according to their own personal whim. So, of course we can expect copyright law to be stretched to the furthest reaches of lunacy (as if it weren't already!).
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
I understand it now.
Posted by: MisesGuy on December 05, 2003 05:24 AMHe's a left-liberal. He subscribes to the "living Constitution" school of thought which means that the Constitution means whatever you want it to mean regardless of what it actually says.
In the real world, "Congress shall make no law" on a certain issue means that Congress shall make no law on that issue. In the left-liberal world of Republicans and Democrats, it means whatever the "living Constitution" has changed to mean over time according to their own personal whim. So, of course we can expect copyright law to be stretched to the furthest reaches of lunacy (as if it weren't already!).
Such is Darl McBride.
#