Posted by: Daniel Baker
on December 05, 2003 05:25 AM
This letter appears not to have been written to the people in general as much as it seems to be catering to those in Washington.
My thoughts are that this letter may have been directly addressed to memebers in various governments in the hope that the congresional officials will not care to read the contents of the GPL or consult with their lawyers on this issue.
The letter has an emotional note that would seem to attempt to place a preconception of dishonesty on the GPL. It would be important to contact our representatives on the matter now to encourage them to look past the facade presented by the misleading document authored by the deranged man at the helm of SCO.
Then again, I like to think our elected officials are well educated and very experienced in looking past this kind of drivel.
A much more insidious meaning...
Posted by: Daniel Baker on December 05, 2003 05:25 AMMy thoughts are that this letter may have been directly addressed to memebers in various governments in the hope that the congresional officials will not care to read the contents of the GPL or consult with their lawyers on this issue.
The letter has an emotional note that would seem to attempt to place a preconception of dishonesty on the GPL. It would be important to contact our representatives on the matter now to encourage them to look past the facade presented by the misleading document authored by the deranged man at the helm of SCO.
Then again, I like to think our elected officials are well educated and very experienced in looking past this kind of drivel.
DBaker
http://daniel.clanbaker.com
#