Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on December 16, 2003 10:17 PM
You assume that because I use KDE exclusively, I don't try each and every version of Gnome. Also, if you bothered to read past the first line, before registering your knee jerk reaction, you would see that I agree with Bruce's choice of Gnome. I simply, further stated that it needs some serious work in order to become acceptable to current KDE and Windows users. And that, my friend, should be a major goal in this endevour. So great, start with a solid unencumbered (non proprietary) base, but get rid of the warts that make it unacceptable to a bunch of would be users. If want want more in depth answers than "Gnome Sucks", just ask. But as far as I can tell nobody is asking for constructive criticism, they just respond with defensive, useless,unproductive, "your sister is ugly too" attacks. Bruce wants to be the captain of a new (Distro) ship. What value to the community, or anyone is it, if it grows to no bigger than a dingy?
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
I use KDE, but I try every new Gnome.
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 16, 2003 10:17 PMAlso, if you bothered to read past the first line, before registering your knee jerk reaction, you would see that I agree with Bruce's choice of Gnome. I simply, further stated that it needs some serious work in order to become acceptable to current KDE and Windows users. And that, my friend, should be a major goal in this endevour. So great, start with a solid unencumbered (non proprietary) base, but get rid of the warts that make it unacceptable to a bunch of would be users. If want want more in depth answers than "Gnome Sucks", just ask. But as far as I can tell nobody is asking for constructive criticism, they just respond with defensive, useless,unproductive, "your sister is ugly too" attacks.
Bruce wants to be the captain of a new (Distro) ship. What value to the community, or anyone is it, if it grows to no bigger than a dingy?
#