Posted by: Blue Lightning
on January 14, 2004 05:51 PM
With all due respect, I think you are wrong. I don't understand why you think these articles could have been bad for Linux gaming. They explain, better than any other article I have read, why Loki failed.
It seems to me from the articles that the failure was due to mismanagement rather than a lack of demand for Linux games. If that's the message you take away from the articles, which I did, then how can they possibly be bad for Linux gaming? If anything they would be the opposite because it might just convince someone that with the right management, a new Linux game company could succeed.
Err..
Posted by: Blue Lightning on January 14, 2004 05:51 PMIt seems to me from the articles that the failure was due to mismanagement rather than a lack of demand for Linux games. If that's the message you take away from the articles, which I did, then how can they possibly be bad for Linux gaming? If anything they would be the opposite because it might just convince someone that with the right management, a new Linux game company could succeed.
#