Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on January 27, 2004 06:42 AM
Just saying arguments are rubbish and saying show me these things is a nonsense argument. How can you show an invention that can't be invented? I'll admit that this doesn't prove things one way or another on itself. However it is shown with resonable confidence that NAT complicates systems, and as such decreases ability to write a networked application by an individual that can deal with it. So it seems quite reasonable to me that inventions are being stiffled. Most of your other counter arguments besides the one above are weak as well, like why rush forward to ipv6? Well even with NAT it's shown that it's just a matter of time before ipv4 runs out, and so not having the infrastructure in place on time is tantamount to creating a crisis deliberatly.
As such ipv6 should be implemented in a timely and orderly fashion while it is still possible.
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:Anonymity
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on January 27, 2004 06:42 AMMost of your other counter arguments besides the one above are weak as well, like why rush forward to ipv6? Well even with NAT it's shown that it's just a matter of time before ipv4 runs out, and so not having the infrastructure in place on time is tantamount to creating a crisis deliberatly.
As such ipv6 should be implemented in a timely and orderly fashion while it is still possible.
Quickshot
#