The document below was emailed to me by an anonymous whistleblower inside SCO. He tells me the typos and syntax bobbles were in the original. I cannot certify its authenticity, but I presume that IBM's, Red Hat's, Novell's, AutoZone's, and Daimler-Chryler's lawyers can subpoena the original.
Cant certify its authenticity? You cant prove if the e-mail is faked or not. Chris Sontags e-mail is easy enough to find out and Cc Bob Bench, Bob Bench is actually Robert Bench. A real whistleblower inside of SCO if he had access to Sontags e-mail would have forwarded the message not relied on copy andpast into a document. This is someone who is just trying toi keep shit started. Without header information it is useless, here is how its going go down:
IBM --- Your honor we would like to subpoena the e-mail from Christopher Sontag dated Sunday, October 12, 2003, titled conversation Friday
SCO --- We dont have that document and as far as we know it doesnt exist
IBM --- Yes it does, Eric Raymond put it up on his site and we have seen it. It was sent by a whistleblower inside of SCO, we know it exists
Judge --- How do you know it exists, do you have header information and digital signatures to prove that its an authentic e-mail
IBM --- Well no we dont, but Eric Raymond says it so it must be true
I dont believe the document is real and I could creat an e-mail message between Eric Raymond and Linus Torvalds and have them conspiring on how to hide SCO IP in Linux? does it make it real? No. Get a life and show something with substance that can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
OpenOffice or is it real?
Posted by: RJDohnert on March 05, 2004 01:14 AMThe document below was emailed to me by an anonymous whistleblower inside SCO. He tells me the typos and syntax bobbles were in the original. I cannot certify its authenticity, but I presume that IBM's, Red Hat's, Novell's, AutoZone's, and Daimler-Chryler's lawyers can subpoena the original.
Cant certify its authenticity? You cant prove if the e-mail is faked or not. Chris Sontags e-mail is easy enough to find out and Cc Bob Bench, Bob Bench is actually Robert Bench. A real whistleblower inside of SCO if he had access to Sontags e-mail would have forwarded the message not relied on copy andpast into a document. This is someone who is just trying toi keep shit started. Without header information it is useless, here is how its going go down:
IBM --- Your honor we would like to subpoena the e-mail from Christopher Sontag dated Sunday, October 12, 2003, titled conversation Friday
SCO --- We dont have that document and as far as we know it doesnt exist
IBM --- Yes it does, Eric Raymond put it up on his site and we have seen it. It was sent by a whistleblower inside of SCO, we know it exists
Judge --- How do you know it exists, do you have header information and digital signatures to prove that its an authentic e-mail
IBM --- Well no we dont, but Eric Raymond says it so it must be true
I dont believe the document is real and I could creat an e-mail message between Eric Raymond and Linus Torvalds and have them conspiring on how to hide SCO IP in Linux? does it make it real? No. Get a life and show something with substance that can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
#