Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on March 13, 2004 02:53 AM
One, He says that Microsoft have suits pending and two, he appears to be a intelligent person desperately trying to make sense of his support for IP bullies.
He's a SCO apologist. When he says nobody has worked out a model for the current industry he overlooks IBM, whom seem to be doing well at present. He's saying that if a company can't compete technologically it should fall back on legalise and paperwork.
Using his logic Windows wouldn't have existed because of MacOS, and MacOS wouldn't exist because of Xerox-PARC!
Bring back Doug Michels! Someone who at least could compete technologically; the last Unixware could barely compete with Windows 2003. Let alone the horridly 1980s OpenUNIX. He should stop trying to kid himself and move with the times.
He talks about nobody been able to compete with Microsoft. Sounds tragically like people saying nobody could compete with IBM in 1985.
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Two points, moving into several.
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 13, 2004 02:53 AMHe's a SCO apologist. When he says nobody has worked out a model for the current industry he overlooks IBM, whom seem to be doing well at present. He's saying that if a company can't compete technologically it should fall back on legalise and paperwork.
Using his logic Windows wouldn't have existed because of MacOS, and MacOS wouldn't exist because of Xerox-PARC!
Bring back Doug Michels! Someone who at least could compete technologically; the last Unixware could barely compete with Windows 2003. Let alone the horridly 1980s OpenUNIX. He should stop trying to kid himself and move with the times.
He talks about nobody been able to compete with Microsoft. Sounds tragically like people saying nobody could compete with IBM in 1985.
#