Thanks for taking the time to reply. The reason I tested 0.15 rather than<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.20 is simple. I always take the time to use a software package for at least several days before offering my opinion on it. Or at least any part of it above and beyond the installation utility.
I listed the version I tested as 0.1 rather than 0.15 simply because I personally don't pay much attention to version changes past the 0.0 mark. Perhaps I should, but to me the differences between (for example) versions 1.44, 1.45, 1.46 and 1.47 generally tend to be too small for a non-programmer like me to detect. I am glad to see that your project is advancing at a good pace and I look forward to getting my hands on an updated copy of Nvu in the near future.
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:Comments from Nvu's author
Posted by: BarrySmith on April 09, 2004 02:33 AMThanks for taking the time to reply. The reason I tested 0.15 rather than<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.20 is simple. I always take the time to use a software package for at least several days before offering my opinion on it. Or at least any part of it above and beyond the installation utility.
I listed the version I tested as 0.1 rather than 0.15 simply because I personally don't pay much attention to version changes past the 0.0 mark. Perhaps I should, but to me the differences between (for example) versions 1.44, 1.45, 1.46 and 1.47 generally tend to be too small for a non-programmer like me to detect. I am glad to see that your project is advancing at a good pace and I look forward to getting my hands on an updated copy of Nvu in the near future.
Regards,
Barry Smith
#