Linux.com

Re:at least the critics were consistent

Posted by: lordcorusa on May 07, 2004 06:57 AM

What makes you so god-like that you _know_ this was a typo? He could actually have meant what he said...

Well, the easy answer to your question is that the author responded to this thread after I did and stated that it was a typo. However, that ex post facto answer probably won't satisfy you.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)

The harder answer is that I have reading comprehension and logical reasoning skills. Anyone even remotely familiar with Linux distributions is aware that there is a constant tension between those who want stability (don't want the distribution to change fast) and those who want features (want the distribution to improve fast). Therefore, when I read that statement and noted the ridiculous tautology, my gut instinct told me that there was about a 99.99% chance that this was a typo.

Perhaps your reading comprehension and logic skills are not as well developed as mine. Perhaps you just haven't been involved with Linux long enough to know about the stability-feature tension. Or perhaps you are so paranoid that you will (sub?)consciously ignore an obvious typo in order to reinforce a predetermined conclusion about a corporation.

#

Return to Red Hat Desktop strategy: Semantics have been part of the messaging problem