Linux.com

Re:Those Damned SCO Spies

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on May 21, 2004 12:49 AM
Wake up and smell the coffee, it's burning. He suspected a SCO spy because a) the guy was obviously not on the up-and-up, as events subsequently affirmed, and b) at that time, SCO was the major purchaser and purveyor of incompetently cooked-up aspersions on Linux. Remember how the first version of their court case claimed that IBM must have given illegal assistance to Linux, because otherwise Linux could never have gotten as good as it did? You're either a troll or a moron, and either way, you're a moron.

#

Return to Some notes on the "Who wrote Linux" kerfuffle