I suppose I should ask "uh, Mr. Dude, sir, are you the *REAL* Anonymous Reader or just an Anonymous Imposter??" Please do not claim credentials and then sign as "Anonymous Reader."
I've read this entire thread and most of "your" (just how many of *you* are there, anyway?) arguments make a deal of sense.
However, your citation of your qualifications is rendered *entirely* useless by falling back on the "Anonymous Reader" dodge. It also makes me wonder about the validity of the arguments that look good, as well.
The point is that I don't *know* anything about you or your qualifications beyond what your posts relate and I don't *really* know that, either; ya could be woofin'...
So when did MIT issue a degree to Mr. A. Reader??
Posted by: fmcgowan on July 24, 2004 05:12 AMI suppose I should ask "uh, Mr. Dude, sir, are you the *REAL* Anonymous Reader or just an Anonymous Imposter??" Please do not claim credentials and then sign as "Anonymous Reader."
I've read this entire thread and most of "your" (just how many of *you* are there, anyway?) arguments make a deal of sense.
However, your citation of your qualifications is rendered *entirely* useless by falling back on the "Anonymous Reader" dodge. It also makes me wonder about the validity of the arguments that look good, as well.
The point is that I don't *know* anything about you or your qualifications beyond what your posts relate and I don't *really* know that, either; ya could be woofin'...
#