Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on August 10, 2004 07:26 PM
ahhh, HELLO! the case was THROWN OUT by the judge, regardless of the plaintiff's pleas not to. Why would DC agree to some 'licensing settlement' with the LOSING PARTY?? Was DC feeling remorseful for shooting down the lawsuit rather easily? Here is a suggestion; look at the history of public allegations and/or statements the 'plaintiff' has made over the course of the last two years or so, and see how many were actually truthful or have panned out<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...just make sure you have your spin-filter turned on. And yes, Groklaw IS a pretty good place to start, since all articles there are actually researched, and therefore have a lot more credebility than this one. -john
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:SCO v. DaimlerChrysler case
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on August 10, 2004 07:26 PMWas DC feeling remorseful for shooting down the lawsuit rather easily?
Here is a suggestion; look at the history of public allegations and/or statements the 'plaintiff' has made over the course of the last two years or so, and see how many were actually truthful or have panned out<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...just make sure you have your spin-filter turned on.
And yes, Groklaw IS a pretty good place to start, since all articles there are actually researched, and therefore have a lot more credebility than this one.
-john
#