Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on September 30, 2004 06:32 PM
>Sigh. But as the article makes abundantly clear the code is NOT THE SAME.
Depending on the exact terms of the contract between Connolly and Sakic, this may or may not be relevant. It is possible that the contract said that Sakic assigned to Connolly the copyright on *any further work by him* on Mambo. But then, Sakic even contends that he signed any contract.
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:GPL faq
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 30, 2004 06:32 PMDepending on the exact terms of the contract between Connolly and Sakic, this may or may not be relevant. It is possible that the contract said that Sakic assigned to Connolly the copyright on *any further work by him* on Mambo. But then, Sakic even contends that he signed any contract.
#