Linux.com

Better than WhiteBox Linux?

Posted by: sgp321 on November 24, 2004 12:05 AM
It sounds like they're changing more than just the logos - should be no need to touch comps.xml, for example, if they really want to be 100% compatible with RHEL.
With WhiteBox Linux, you know that you're getting the exact same code as RHEL - full binary compatability; this sounds more like a distribution based on RHEL than an accurate clone.

#

Return to Review: CentOS 3.3 is a good Red Hat server alternative