Linux.com

Re:you have to wonder

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 23, 2004 02:27 AM
> When vendors release source code to older products which have minimal market share, and the codebase is > large (say 1M+ LOC), does that do anyone any favors? It might be faster to re-implement from
> scratch than to get a development team trained on all that code - and you could architect for today's
> requirements, not yesterday's.

Sure sometimes. But in this case (db2 probably), it has a large marketshare, and capabilities beyond anything in the open source space. Like:

  - partitioning (3 different types)

  - mature replication

  - high-availability solutions

  - parallelism

  - etc

So, you can spread a database across fifty commodity server (similar to a beowulf cluster) straight out of the box. You can also partition a table - and get massive performance-benefits on huge queries.

Since the open-source alternatives lack this commonly-used functionality, if you needed to manage vast amounts of data with an open source database your only option would be to spring a couple million for a huge regatta, E15k, etc - to try to get the same performance from mysql/postgresql/etc - that you could get from db2/oracle on a $50k server.

#

Return to Database vendors are joining the open source party