Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on February 09, 2005 11:19 PM
Probably an oversight that he did not mention OpenBSD in the conclusion.
If he does edit the conclusion to add OpenBSD, I hope he has some thoughts on the effects of ProPolice (a stack guard) on the tests. The OpenBSD kernel is compiled with ProPolice enabled, and by default all programs will also be compiled with ProPolice (unless specifally disabled),
Re:No OpenBSD 3.6 in conclusion?
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 09, 2005 11:19 PMIf he does edit the conclusion to add OpenBSD, I hope he has some thoughts on the effects of ProPolice (a stack guard) on the tests. The OpenBSD kernel is compiled with ProPolice enabled, and by default all programs will also be compiled with ProPolice (unless specifally disabled),
#