Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on February 15, 2005 08:26 PM
Yes, and LG is such a minor manufacturer surely neither Mandrake nor any of its beta testers would had an opportunity to test on an LG drive.
Please don't make claims like this without bothering to research the issue.
Mandrakesoft's QA department did actually test on a number of LG drives (including models that were affected), but they all had the newer firmware (which did not have the flaw) prior to the 9.2 release.
Why would the problem be fixed in newer firmwares LG was shipping if it wasn't an LG bug? Why did LG replace drives if it was a software-only bug?
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:the top of the top!
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 15, 2005 08:26 PMPlease don't make claims like this without bothering to research the issue.
Mandrakesoft's QA department did actually test on a number of LG drives (including models that were affected), but they all had the newer firmware (which did not have the flaw) prior to the 9.2 release.
Why would the problem be fixed in newer firmwares LG was shipping if it wasn't an LG bug? Why did LG replace drives if it was a software-only bug?
#