Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on March 30, 2005 05:24 AM
I am much concerned about this statement:
"groklaw has done the same thing. used pdfs from <a href="http://scofacts.org/scofacts.html" title="scofacts.org">http://scofacts.org/scofacts.html</a scofacts.org> [scofacts.org]and didnt provide the credit to that site"
Did the pdfs become a permanent part of the site?
If the pdfs did not become a permanent part of the site, how did PJ use them? Did she subsequently take them down?
If the pdfs did become a permanent part of the site, which article do they appear in? Please point them out.
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:Br3n accusation
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 30, 2005 05:24 AM"groklaw has done the same thing. used pdfs from <a href="http://scofacts.org/scofacts.html" title="scofacts.org">http://scofacts.org/scofacts.html</a scofacts.org> [scofacts.org]and didnt provide the credit to that site"
Did the pdfs become a permanent part of the site?
If the pdfs did not become a permanent part of the site, how did PJ use them? Did she subsequently take them down?
If the pdfs did become a permanent part of the site, which article do they appear in? Please point them out.
-Wang-Lo.
#