Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on July 15, 2005 07:58 AM
I too found that Fedora Core 4 was fine. I'm running it on my Compaq Presario M2013 laptop (Centrino). Everything works nicely for me though.
I dont understand though, why the author mixes Livna with FreshRPMS when that mixture is known to have <a href="http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/apt/FAQ.php#D" title="wieers.com">problems</a wieers.com>. If you are using FreshRPMS, you should be mixing it from other 3rd party repositories that conform to <a href="http://www.rpmforge.net/" title="rpmforge.net">RPMforge</a rpmforge.net>. These folks make an extra effort to make sure that they are compatible with both Fedora Core, Fedora Extras and each other (FreshRPMS, DagRPMS, DriesRPMS, NewRPMS and PlanetCCRMA are all members of RPMforge).
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:I found FC4 was fine...
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 15, 2005 07:58 AMI too found that Fedora Core 4 was fine. I'm running it on my Compaq Presario M2013 laptop (Centrino). Everything works nicely for me though.
I dont understand though, why the author mixes Livna with FreshRPMS when that mixture is known to have <a href="http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/apt/FAQ.php#D" title="wieers.com">problems</a wieers.com>. If you are using FreshRPMS, you should be mixing it from other 3rd party repositories that conform to <a href="http://www.rpmforge.net/" title="rpmforge.net">RPMforge</a rpmforge.net>. These folks make an extra effort to make sure that they are compatible with both Fedora Core, Fedora Extras and each other (FreshRPMS, DagRPMS, DriesRPMS, NewRPMS and PlanetCCRMA are all members of RPMforge).
#