Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on July 19, 2005 12:58 AM
>But, he is still entitled to state his opinion on the matter.
B.S.
No -- you, really are full of B.S. We're fully capable of stating our opinion whether you like it or not.
You guys feel like you're entitled to free development and free products.
No, something (Cinelerra) was offered for free by the developer, used, and an opinion was expressed by that user.
F***C OFF you leechers. Pay the developer and then you can start making all kinds of demands.
Ha, that's funny. How can you can you be a leech if the program was offered with no strings attached (other than say, the GPL to ensure it stays that way)? Anything the developer gets in return for his free software, including an opinion from the user is extra. If the developer wants or expects something in exchange for the use of his program then he should not offer it for free.
"Free" is a one-sided transaction. So is "Gift".
I suppose in your world view everyone has to provide a quid pro quo exchange, including the ability to talk to you? Well, you F**ing leecher, did you forget to pay back for all the food and clothes you got during your childhood?
F***C OFF you leechers. Pay the developer and then you can start making all kinds of demands.
Yea, no doubt you'd like everything in the computer world to be a "pay-for" transaction. You sound like a secret Microsoft astroturfer.
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:Why don't you STFU?
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 19, 2005 12:58 AMB.S.
No -- you, really are full of B.S. We're fully capable of stating our opinion whether you like it or not.
You guys feel like you're entitled to free development and free products.
No, something (Cinelerra) was offered for free by the developer, used, and an opinion was expressed by that user.
F***C OFF you leechers. Pay the developer and then you can start making all kinds of demands.
Ha, that's funny. How can you can you be a leech if the program was offered with no strings attached (other than say, the GPL to ensure it stays that way)? Anything the developer gets in return for his free software, including an opinion from the user is extra. If the developer wants or expects something in exchange for the use of his program then he should not offer it for free.
"Free" is a one-sided transaction. So is "Gift".
I suppose in your world view everyone has to provide a quid pro quo exchange, including the ability to talk to you? Well, you F**ing leecher, did you forget to pay back for all the food and clothes you got during your childhood?
F***C OFF you leechers. Pay the developer and then you can start making all kinds of demands.
Yea, no doubt you'd like everything in the computer world to be a "pay-for" transaction. You sound like a secret Microsoft astroturfer.
#