Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on July 20, 2005 10:11 AM
i was asking about the author's experience with respect to using mysql and his corresponding code changes. that's the point of the article and not strictly mysql usage, which i could easily have looked up in the their site.
the COMMIT/ROLLBACK pair's impact on the code is the point. not their existence.
same with how he handled foerign keys in the code.
the problem with you mysql churchgoers is that you identify anything short of an obvious question as FUD against mysql, which is not.
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:additional issues
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 20, 2005 10:11 AMwith respect to using mysql and his
corresponding code changes. that's the point of
the article and not strictly mysql usage,
which i could easily have looked up in the their
site.
the COMMIT/ROLLBACK pair's impact on the code
is the point. not their existence.
same with how he handled foerign keys in
the code.
the problem with you mysql churchgoers
is that you identify anything short of an
obvious question as FUD against mysql,
which is not.
go eat some shit, wiseass.
#