Linux.com

Habib need to get out more

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on August 29, 2005 07:59 PM
What the heck does Habib mean by "C++, Java and Python . . .
are the only languages which can be used for serious software."
Talk about
clueless bigotry! Habib, you need to be whacked a few times with the clue stick.


The strange irony of the UML scene presented is how brittle the design of most of
these projects are. A least three of the projects are inexplicably, intrinsically tangled up with
some particular desktop or computing environment. You would think that a crew who fancied themselves
as OOP hotshots in need of a UML diagrams would actually have a notion of what good Object Oriented
Design entails.


Abstraction and loose coupling are two attributes of OOD which these bumpkins
have completely overlooked. Locking a design to a particular desktop is such a heinous miscue given
all that we have learned about what good OO design entails.
And whadda ya bet that these cowboys have book shelves loaded up with
tomes on the latest "design patterns" and advanced OO techniques. As for Argo lacking any
documentation, well . . . what can one say--I'm speechless. And ironically Argo is the oldest of all the
projects mentioned!

#

Return to Open source UML editors lag proprietary leader