Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on January 29, 2006 04:34 PM
I think you are wrong. The kernel license can change over time if there is a true need.
I would expect that first Linus would create a new tree that would become available under a new license and request that all authors provide patches to remove their code if they disagree. After an acceptable waiting period the new tree would be relicensed under the new license.
Re:When Linus says no to the GPL v3, it means NO.
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on January 29, 2006 04:34 PMI would expect that first Linus would create a new tree that would become available under a new license and request that all authors provide patches to remove their code if they disagree. After an acceptable waiting period the new tree would be relicensed under the new license.
#