Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on April 16, 2006 07:16 PM
should be the quality and usefulness of the software, not the license behind,
Typical lying <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing" title="wikipedia.org">astroturfer</a wikipedia.org> trying to insinuate that the license isn't an an important part of the featureset of a program.
Licenses matter. What you can do with the software matters. Freedom matters.
Re:Amazing - typical commercial astroturfer
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 16, 2006 07:16 PMshould be the quality and usefulness of the software, not the license behind,
Typical lying <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing" title="wikipedia.org">astroturfer</a wikipedia.org> trying to insinuate that the license isn't an an important part of the featureset of a program.
Licenses matter. What you can do with the software matters. Freedom matters.
#