Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on June 24, 2006 03:50 AM
Personally, I've had the opposite experience. Dapper Ubuntu seems a whole lot better than Breezy Ubuntu.
The main complains I've seen, center around the following users:
* Some people who install via the LiveCD * Some people who have ATI cards * Some people who have certain scanners. * Some Edubuntu users (note, *buntus all tend to get classified as Ubuntu, even though they all have different levels of maturity. When Breezy came out, Kubuntu complaints gave the impression that Ubuntu was a piece of garbage.)
I don't fall into any of these categories (Ubuntu, NVidia, upgrade install, no scanner), and except for LiveCD users, most people don't either, so don't let this cloud your judgment on a fine distro.
Re:Sadly...
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on June 24, 2006 03:50 AMThe main complains I've seen, center around the following users:
* Some people who install via the LiveCD
* Some people who have ATI cards
* Some people who have certain scanners.
* Some Edubuntu users (note, *buntus all tend to get classified as Ubuntu, even though they all have different levels of maturity. When Breezy came out, Kubuntu complaints gave the impression that Ubuntu was a piece of garbage.)
I don't fall into any of these categories (Ubuntu, NVidia, upgrade install, no scanner), and except for LiveCD users, most people don't either, so don't let this cloud your judgment on a fine distro.
#