This is exactly why standard bodies need to adopt a "scorched earth" NO PATENTS policy. What good is a standardized way of doing things, if a standards body has to say: "Use this, but pay Robber Baron Companies X, Y and Z a fee for the privilege."
Drop the RAND policies and adopt a strict NO PATENTS stance. Go further than that and declare any ongoing standardization process dead if patent claims arise and refuse to standardize anything that might fall under a patent. Reconsider only when the claiming party assigns the patent to an open, world-wide and royalty free patent pool.
The industry needs to feel the hurt when it comes to Intellectual Terrorism. Either support standards, no strings attached or suffer proprietary incompatibility.
Standard bodies need to reform.
Posted by: Ronald Trip on June 30, 2006 06:29 PMDrop the RAND policies and adopt a strict NO PATENTS stance. Go further than that and declare any ongoing standardization process dead if patent claims arise and refuse to standardize anything that might fall under a patent. Reconsider only when the claiming party assigns the patent to an open, world-wide and royalty free patent pool.
The industry needs to feel the hurt when it comes to Intellectual Terrorism. Either support standards, no strings attached or suffer proprietary incompatibility.
#