Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on August 14, 2006 08:55 PM
> I think the author's being a little too paranoid here. He isn't.
> the real reason companys don't want news of a vulnerability to get out [...] > the greater the chance some script kiddie will exploit it, > and the greater the chance that their customers will get hurt as a result. Corporations don't care of their customers.
You should have been following e.g. bugtraq@ for several years to understand this quite clearly.
> information in this case *doesn't* want to be free. Information can't want anything.
think harder
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on August 14, 2006 08:55 PMHe isn't.
> the real reason companys don't want news of a vulnerability to get out
[...]
> the greater the chance some script kiddie will exploit it,
> and the greater the chance that their customers will get hurt as a result.
Corporations don't care of their customers.
You should have been following e.g. bugtraq@ for several years to understand this quite clearly.
> information in this case *doesn't* want to be free.
Information can't want anything.
--
Michael Shigorin
#