Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on August 25, 2006 12:30 AM
That the system is still unpopular doesn't make it inherently secure. The author of this article doesn't mention the system's design being security-oriented, or even at least security-concious. I think it could be a dangerous comment, but I'd rather think that the author is misinformed about information security.
Even if there are currently no virus targetting this OS, it is rather naïve to think that someone couldn't write one with great ease.
Not popular != secure
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2006 12:30 AMEven if there are currently no virus targetting this OS, it is rather naïve to think that someone couldn't write one with great ease.
#