Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on September 16, 2006 09:09 AM
A couple of years ago, Richard Stallman provided a link from his home page <a href="http://www.stallman.org/archives/2004-may-aug.html" title="stallman.org">http://www.stallman.org/archives/2004-may-aug.htm<nobr>l<wbr></nobr> </a stallman.org> to a 9/11 article on the forum of www.globalresearch.ca that I have since posted on <a href="http://linux.coconia.net/" title="coconia.net">http://linux.coconia.net/</a coconia.net> and <a href="http://m.domaindlx.com/LinuxHelp/" title="domaindlx.com">http://m.domaindlx.com/LinuxHelp/</a domaindlx.com>, namely:
"The World Trade Center Fires - Proof that 9/11 is a Gigantic Lie."
On his website he states "I am not knowledgeable enough to judge the validity of these arguments, but if the 9/11 investigation does not consider them carefully, it is bogus."
I would like Richard to tell me if he has come to any conclusions yet (concerning the article).
Hi Richard;
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 16, 2006 09:09 AM"The World Trade Center Fires - Proof that 9/11 is a Gigantic Lie."
<a href="http://linux.coconia.net/gr/523.htm" title="coconia.net">http://linux.coconia.net/gr/523.htm</a coconia.net>
<a href="http://m.domaindlx.com/LinuxHelp/gr/523.htm" title="domaindlx.com">http://m.domaindlx.com/LinuxHelp/gr/523.htm</a domaindlx.com>
On his website he states "I am not knowledgeable enough to judge the validity of these arguments, but if the 9/11 investigation does not consider them carefully, it is bogus."
I would like Richard to tell me if he has come to any conclusions yet (concerning the article).
#