Posted by: Administrator
on December 23, 2003 09:25 AM
Thatīs right. Working in Eurpoe Mandrake is far better valued here then in the USA. I had Mandrake 9.1 and Redhat 8 duak booting and opted for the Mandrake based on my own experience. Why...basically ease of use and hardware. The Mandrake automatically picked up my printers and even m Kodak digital camera and Nikon slide scanner. As a desktop I cannot thi9nk of anything easier to use, my wife uses it and refuses to use anything else including Mac OSX or Windows XP saying that she is completely comfortable with it. Also I have the 9.2 working as a server for a web design company here in Spain with 4 different Mac systems and 3 different Windows systems and they were not only happy to pay me but also to pay a license fee to Mandrake. Oh and for those killer apps VMware, Crossover Office and that replacement for Apt-get URPMI,
P.S,
Suse well 9 out of 10 for the graphics but the rest sucks
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:Fedora vs SuSE vs Mandrake
Posted by: Administrator on December 23, 2003 09:25 AMP.S,
Suse well 9 out of 10 for the graphics but the rest sucks
#