Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on December 11, 2006 01:50 PM
I think this is more of a language barrier issue than a GPL issue. Their source CDs are available on the Chinese version of the web site for their latest product. It just helps to be able to read Chinese in order to find them.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)
For example: <a href="http://www.redflag-linux.com/xiazai/xiazai.php?id=1409" title="redflag-linux.com">http://www.redflag-linux.com/xiazai/xiazai.php?id<nobr>=<wbr></nobr> 1409</a redflag-linux.com>
Points to RedFlag-dt5-disc1-src.iso, the disc 1 source CD for RedFlag Desktop 5.0.
Here is another example that points to more of their products (again, in Chinese): <a href="http://www.redflag-linux.com/xiazai/yingyong.php?down_type=00" title="redflag-linux.com">http://www.redflag-linux.com/xiazai/yingyong.php?<nobr>d<wbr></nobr> own_type=00</a redflag-linux.com>
The English language RedFlag site doesn't even list Desktop 5.0<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... then again, English is not an option in the installer of Desktop 5.0.
If you make a claim like "GPL Violations", it would be good to see your references, otherwise it's kinda like SCO saying their proprietary code is in Linux...
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:Persistent GPL Violations
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 11, 2006 01:50 PMFor example:
<a href="http://www.redflag-linux.com/xiazai/xiazai.php?id=1409" title="redflag-linux.com">http://www.redflag-linux.com/xiazai/xiazai.php?id<nobr>=<wbr></nobr> 1409</a redflag-linux.com>
Points to RedFlag-dt5-disc1-src.iso, the disc 1 source CD for RedFlag Desktop 5.0.
Here is another example that points to more of their products (again, in Chinese): <a href="http://www.redflag-linux.com/xiazai/yingyong.php?down_type=00" title="redflag-linux.com">http://www.redflag-linux.com/xiazai/yingyong.php?<nobr>d<wbr></nobr> own_type=00</a redflag-linux.com>
The English language RedFlag site doesn't even list Desktop 5.0<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... then again, English is not an option in the installer of Desktop 5.0.
If you make a claim like "GPL Violations", it would be good to see your references, otherwise it's kinda like SCO saying their proprietary code is in Linux...
#