Linux.com

Correction made

Posted by: nanday on September 15, 2006 01:39 PM
'"He also said," Maryanovsky writes, "that they are planning to wrap Jin in a layer that would allow it to be controlled via a socket. I told [Rabinovitch] that I believe this would still, most likely, be violating the GPL." Despite this opinion, IChessU proceeded with its plan [snip]

That's wrong. As I mention on my page, they abandonded that idea and proceeded to use Jin in a straightforward manner.'

My apologies for the error. I have now corrected it.

Thanks for pointing it out,

Bruce Byfield (nanday)

#

Return to Alleged GPL violation spurs accusations, lawsuit