Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on September 26, 2006 10:53 PM
All theese discussions are pointless. Torvalds and associates are the authors of the kernel. They have made the decision about the license, and that's it. There is nothing to be said about it, wether one likes it or not.
It is clear that Torvalds and associates are satisfied with existing license and that they intend to release software under it in the future. Why would any of them participate in definition of some other license that they are not interested in ?
FSF people might enforce their license for using GPLed software, but they should give up on enforcing their point of view, because no one seems to care to listen to them.
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
pointless
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 26, 2006 10:53 PMIt is clear that Torvalds and associates are satisfied with existing license and that they intend to release software under it in the future. Why would any of them participate in definition of some other license that they are not interested in ?
FSF people might enforce their license for using GPLed software, but they should give up on enforcing their point of view, because no one seems to care to listen to them.
DG
DG
#