Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on October 13, 2006 05:46 PM
Gus3 says: Don't blindly quote benchmarks.
The turkey Gus3 would rather quote NO benchmarks at all.
Or, lie about the benchmarks that are considered.
The -s0 option suppresses the Sequential Output/Input part of the test.
Here is the test carried out on an old box (hence figures are lower than those of Szaka - only the relative performance counts) with the -s option - with file-size 2016M - the file-size for the second part of the test is 16K as before:
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Gus3 is ignorant.
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on October 13, 2006 05:46 PMThe turkey Gus3 would rather quote NO benchmarks at all.
Or, lie about the benchmarks that are considered.
The -s0 option suppresses the Sequential Output/Input part of the test.
Here is the test carried out on an old box (hence figures are lower than those of Szaka - only the relative performance counts) with the -s option - with file-size 2016M - the file-size for the second part of the test is 16K as before:
Gus3 says: Don't blindly quote benchmarks.
______------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
______-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP__/sec %CP
2016M 38093__61 42896__27 15334___7 31245__38 34748___9 166.3___0
______------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
______-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files__/sec %CP__/sec %CP__/sec %CP__/sec %CP__/sec %CP__/sec %CP
___16 13683 100 +++++ +++ 14125__93 13272__99 +++++ +++ 12984__93
#