Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on November 28, 2006 10:00 PM
Actually, Eben and RMS both have said, repeatedly, that while input is welcome, the decision-making process itself "will not be a democratic process." In this case, RMS and Eben are the "benevolent dictators" just as Linus is with Linux or Theo is with OpenBSD. Even Eben says that his job is to ensure that he does the job that his client--the FSF, in this case--wants him to do.
Re:On GPLv3 - here's RMS's take
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on November 28, 2006 10:00 PM#