Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on December 20, 2006 09:42 PM
Making blanket statements such as this certainly does not inspire confidence in the writer's post. All of these posts reflect each reader's OPINION, so really should be stated as such. To me Konqueror is a horrible file manager because it is slow, and has an extremely cluttered UI, much like KDE itself, which is why I do not use KDE. Nautilus is my FM of choice and for me, does everything I need it to, very well, which is why I use Gnome. I use MC every day when I am at the CLI.
You should be happy we have a choice, unlike users of the evil empire's "OS", rather than flatly stating one particular FM does everything better.
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:Konqueror - All Other Pale In Comparison
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 20, 2006 09:42 PMYou should be happy we have a choice, unlike users of the evil empire's "OS", rather than flatly stating one particular FM does everything better.
#