Linux.com

GM is way faster!

Posted by: Administrator on January 12, 2007 01:57 PM
"Since GraphicsMagick is more “stable”, more time has been spent optimizing and debugging its code. GraphicsMagick is often faster than ImageMagick."

  -- GraphicsMagick's FAQ, Question #1



True. GM runs in about 70% of IM's time. It's a huge difference for batch processing.



shalbum now supports both GM and IM and defaults to GM. [1]



[1] <a href="http://sf.net/projects/shalbum" title="sf.net">http://sf.net/projects/shalbum</a sf.net>

#

Return to ImageMagick or GraphicsMagick?